Meet Ur Planet

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Plane boarding
  • Tourist guide
  • Hotel accommodation
  • Travel booking
  • Vacation rentals

Meet Ur Planet

Header Banner

Meet Ur Planet

  • Home
  • Plane boarding
  • Tourist guide
  • Hotel accommodation
  • Travel booking
  • Vacation rentals
Plane boarding
Home›Plane boarding›Why arresting tennis star at Melbourne airport was “grossly ineffective”

Why arresting tennis star at Melbourne airport was “grossly ineffective”

By Meg P. Sousa
January 6, 2022
0
0


Novak Djokovic should never have been allowed to board a plane bound for Australia if the federal government had concerns about his medical exemption, a former senior immigration official said.

The Djokovic incident, which has become an international market diplomatic stoush between Canberra and Belgrade, highlighted a series of “grossly ineffective” control practices by immigration officials, said Abul Rizvi, former deputy secretary of the immigration ministry.

Mr Rizvi also said Commonwealth lawyers could face a difficult task in court when they attempt to resist the defending Australian Open champion’s attempt to overturn his visa cancellation. .

Novak Djokovic was captured on his way to Australia and denied his visa. (9News)

“Like anyone else who tries to come to Australia, (Djokovic) deserves to be treated with respect and properly,” Mr. Rizvi said, explaining how the tennis star’s request was allowed to pass successfully through. two layers of visa protection, setting up the current conflicting impasse.

Instead of stopping Djokovic’s candidacy prematurely, he was allowed to squeeze through the gaps and reach a third layer, Mr Rizvi said, which was the worst outcome for everyone.

“The first layer of protection is when you apply for and get a visa,” he said.

“This is when all the relevant legal criteria must be taken into account.

“And then, and only then, should the visa be granted.

“It looks like in Mr Djokovic’s case the government said, ‘We have taken into account some of the requirements and some that we will check later and give you a visa anyway. “”

Mr Rizvi said that at this point Djokovic had “a right to believe” that the Australian government would allow him to enter Australia.

The second level of border protection is when a passenger boards an airline to travel to Australia.

There will be Australian Border Force members standing behind airline staff at the port of departure, ready to remove passengers or order staff to remove people from the plane if they have any concerns. .

“They could have prevented Djokovic from landing (in Australia) or boarding the plane if they had had these concerns a few hours earlier,” Rizvi said.

“Instead, they used the third layer, which is the most ineffective point to deal with this.”

Novak Djokovic has been confined to an immigrant detention hotel as the world's No.1 male tennis player awaits a court ruling on his ability to compete in the Australian Open later this month.
Novak Djokovic has been confined to an immigrant detention hotel as the world’s No.1 male tennis player awaits a court ruling on his suitability to compete in the Australian Open later this month. (PA)

Mr Rizvi said that the interception and removal of people at the border “should only be carried out in cases of absolute urgency or when there have been dramatic changes in circumstances or some other alarming event s ‘is produced “.

“Returning it to the airport is totally inefficient,” Mr. Rizvi said.

Two states battered by a mighty royal tide and dangerous waves

Commonwealth lawyers “will have to produce most of the evidence” when Djokovic’s appeal is heard in a federal circuit and family court on Monday, he said.

“The first thing the Commonwealth government will have to prove is why did they give him a visa if he didn’t meet all the legal requirements?”

Mr Rizvi said it was a “very difficult” question for the Commonwealth to answer for the judge.

The Commonwealth will also have to explain why they let Djokovic board the plane if they had any concerns, Mr Rizvi said, and they will also have to describe exactly the circumstances that led the government to suddenly cancel his visa.

“I think these three questions will be difficult for the Commonwealth to answer.”

Vaccine skeptic Novak Djokovic had traveled to Australia after authorities in Victoria state granted him a medical exemption from the country's strict vaccination requirements.  But when he arrived on Wednesday evening, Australian border forces dismissed his exemption as invalid and barred him from entering the country.
Vaccine skeptic Novak Djokovic had traveled to Australia after authorities in Victoria state granted him a medical exemption from the country’s strict vaccination requirements. But when he arrived on Wednesday evening, Australian border forces dismissed his exemption as invalid and barred him from entering the country. (PA)

If Djokovic wins his appeal, the government could appeal that decision.

However, if Djokovic wins, Rizvi said the government “would drop out from that point on and seek to blame someone else”.

If Djokovic’s appeal is dismissed, the world number 1 could appeal, Mr Rizvi said, but it could be a futile decision.

Mr Rizvi strongly doubted that Djokovic could wrap up a successful call in time to defend his title at the Australian Open, which begins on January 17.


Related posts:

  1. 23-year-old Toronto filmmaker heads to UN climate summit to shoot documentary
  2. Millions of Americans hit the road and board planes for Thanksgiving
  3. This pilot project brings hope to Afghan refugees on their journey to America
  4. There is something to complain about to the airlines | Chroniclers
Tagsboarding plane

Categories

  • Hotel accommodation
  • Plane boarding
  • Tourist guide
  • Travel booking
  • Vacation rentals

Recent Posts

  • Ice Poseidon explains his side of the infamous plane crash that led to Twitch’s ban
  • Beware of Claims of Financial Inclusion Amid Cryptocurrency
  • Why the middle seat passenger should have both armrests on the plane
  • Flip-flops and other clothing items that could get you banned from flying
  • Virginia Court Approved $489 Million in Aid for Victims of Illegal Internet Payday Loans

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • April 2013
  • September 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2011
  • June 2009
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions