Meet Ur Planet

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Plane boarding
  • Tourist guide
  • Hotel accommodation
  • Travel booking
  • Vacation rentals

Meet Ur Planet

Header Banner

Meet Ur Planet

  • Home
  • Plane boarding
  • Tourist guide
  • Hotel accommodation
  • Travel booking
  • Vacation rentals
Vacation rentals
Home›Vacation rentals›Las Vegas homeless ordinance sparks community concerns

Las Vegas homeless ordinance sparks community concerns

By Meg P. Sousa
March 9, 2021
0
0

A proposal to make it a crime to camp or sleep in a public right-of-way in downtown and residential Las Vegas is meeting resistance from various voices, including presidential candidate Julian Castro who showed up at city hall on Wednesday to speak to protesters outside.

The Las Vegas City Council’s proposal would apply if sleeping space is available at the Courtyard Homeless Resource Center or other non-profit service provider in the so-called “Corridor of Hope”. People could be fined up to $ 1,000 or up to six months in jail.

During the council meeting, the Nevada ACLU, Make the Road Nevada, Faith Organizing Alliance and several other groups have come together in protest.

“We think this is the wrong approach to working with our homeless community,” said Lalo Montoya, political director of Make the Road Nevada.

“Criminalizing them is not the right way to go about it. Our city is one of the top ten in terms of lack of shelters or affordable housing for our homeless population,” Montoya added. think we need to talk about resources for our most vulnerable Nevadans. “

Gerald Gillock, a lawyer whose law firm is located in an area where the ordinance would be enforced, says he supports the relocation of homeless people from the city center, but also said the city must take responsibility to provide bathrooms or to clean.

“This app does not include any provision allowing the city to provide any type of portable sanitation,” Gillock said during the city council’s public comment period Wednesday morning.

“What is happening is that the homeless are sleeping on the city streets every day, and the city has determined that they have the right to be there. But each of those people has to go to the bathroom, ”said Gillock. “I know the city is doing something with this ordinance, but that’s not all you can do.”

Outside of the meeting, Gillock further explained his complaint.

“The ordinance does not require them to install a toilet. Right now, every day, 18 to 25 people go to the bathroom in the alley behind my desk. You just have to walk down 4th Street and it’s a total stench, ”Gillock said in an interview.

Gillock is concerned that with the way the order is worded, the police may stay it at their discretion and his office will continue to experience the same issues.

“All the police have to say is ‘it’s full’,” and it’s full right now. It’s full before the prescription even starts, ”said Gillock. “Yes [the city] says they have a civil right to be there, so they have to provide sanitation.

Gillock was referring to the bed capacity of the Courtyard Homeless Resources Center, a city-funded facility that does not provide shelter, but rather a temporary “safe zone” in an outdoor area where homeless people can sleep. on rugs on the floor.

When the time came for Mayor Carolyn Goodman to present the ordinance for discussion, city council members voted unanimously to proceed without further discussion. The next hearing on the matter will be on October 14.

Former city councilor Bob Coffin said on Twitter that city council had no choice but to create the ordinance because the legislature had not approved funding to tackle homelessness.

Castro saw it differently.

“We should never criminalize desperation, whether it is people with no choice and living on the streets, or public rights of way, or immigrants seeking a better life in our country. “Castro told about 40 protesters as a new ordinance was proposed inside the building.

Coffin was not impressed and noted, “[Julian Castro] is terribly ill-informed about the problem in our city. He doesn’t realize that our ability to deal with homelessness has been severely limited by the Democratic legislature’s refusal to allow the city of Las Vegas to raise funds to expand our facilities.

Assembly Bill 73, which was originally designed to create a steady stream of income for homeless services and the creation of affordable housing, was essentially eviscerated through an amendment sponsored by Democrat MP Dina Neal that cut down on details and called on local governments to create task forces to identify funding sources.

Related posts:

  1. New Mobile Apps Instant Pay Remake Payday
  2. Amigo Loans investigated fears he is lending to people who could not afford to repay their loans
  3. We spend 43% of disposable income within 24 hours of payday
  4. Truro men combine skills to open new cafe

Categories

  • Hotel accommodation
  • Plane boarding
  • Tourist guide
  • Travel booking
  • Vacation rentals

Recent Posts

  • How to spot predatory lenders
  • Coralie Chun Matayoshi Explains the Effects of Sea Level Rise on Hawaii Homes
  • Prankster causes panic after putting up ‘Welcome to Luton’ sign near Gatwick Airport
  • What it’s like to fly business class on United Airlines’ historic new flight to Amman, Jordan
  • Ice Poseidon explains his side of the infamous plane crash that led to Twitch’s ban

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • September 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • April 2013
  • September 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2011
  • June 2009
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions